Inherent Anticipation

Fact that particular characteristic is necessary feature or result of prior art embodiment of invention is sufficient for inherent anticipation, even if that fact was unknown at time of prior invention.  Thus, proof of inherent anticipation does not require showing that person of ordinary skill in art would have recognized that asserted inherent characteristic was necessarily present in thing described in allegedly anticipating reference.  (Toro Co. v. Deere & Co., 69 USPQ2d 1584, CA FC, 1/20/04)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s